Rules as Writ + Errata

Between about February and October 2023, Iver and I play-tested TiTE 1 via Vassal.  We played the Barbarossa scenario up to the end of the Sept 4, 1941 turn at which point we called the game. We used TiTE1 as modified by elements of TiTE2 for playtesting. We believe our comments to be applicable to

hello :) (...) " Once released, those specific units remain so until and unless returned to their Claimed Territory or Force Pool (per 553.3.3) I do not find a 553.3.3 rule. william :)

This point seems strange for me : If the modified result is equal to the overrun unit(s) Defense Strength: • Apply an EX combat result (246.0). Place the MA force in the target hex, and it may complete its movement. However: o If there is a No Retreat unit in the hex, it will be eliminat

Just to mention : [541.0] CAPTURING OBJECTIVES IN A CAMPAIGN GAME These Campaign Game rules extend rule 128.4.4 (sharing its title). Unless I'm mistaken, it appears that Rule 128.4.4 is not included in the booklet (TITE2 rules) W44 :)

For Thunder in the East, the beginning is Barbarossa just before July 1941. The other ETO games will have their own start. Researching the Order of Battle for all the countries early in the war has lead to a slight change in the starting forces, mostly in the rear areas, for the Soviets. Below is a

Hello, Can someone point me to a sequence of play player aid card that is compatible with rules version 1.1? The player aid that shipped with the game is very useful and detailed but differs from the sequence of play published in the rules booklet.

With the Arctic Theatre out of play, if the Germans capture Tikhvin (or hit the Arctic Theatre boundary further east), does this isolate ground units in Leningrad, or can they trace an OLoC through the Arctic?Or must the Germans capture Volkhov? Similarly, can Leningrad trace an RLoC through the Arc

Germans get a win, the Soviets get a win. Playtesting is happening with an all new Battle for Moscow II. Some are using their TiTE game, some the Vassal module and a couple have printed out the files. Chris in Dublin, has developed a ZunTzu module. With a larger map than the earlier B4M, there are

I'd just like to confirm that if I download and print all the files from 1A, that I don't need any of the orignal player aids, cards or rule book? Or if I do need some of the original material, what would that be? Also, is this the best place to ask questions about TITE or should I use BBG or Cons

(...) One Intercept Packet can intercept each enemy Mission Packet (so if two Mission Packets are going to a hex, there can there be two Intercept Packets, one specifically intercepting each Mission Packet). Does it really mean this: If there are 2 enemy Mission Packets and 2 Intercept Packets, wil

Hello, I don't understand this example. Why can the Russian establish a OLOC to 9762 from sebatopol and not to 9662, as it seems they do ? If the 51st Army is supplied at 9762, why wouldn't it be at 9662 or even 9661 ? But for me : Sebastopol is a non-projetting supply source, the OLOC ca

hello ... again the frenchy... I hope it's ok with my questions... This sentence is difficult for me to understand because it has several nested levels : [423.4.2] EMERGENCY EVACUATION: (...)Halve their specific sums (up) and immediately add that many half or full PPs (Non-specialists) to the RP p

Hello, as rules 1.1: building a specialist AIR UNIT only happens on the first turn of each month, depleting the specialist allowance for a Nationality for that turn. My question is: includes the above rule also re-equiping an air unit? Can you only build or re-equip an air unit on the first turn of

This game was using the Vassal module to track things but played in person. The only change we make was to have the Romanians, Hungarians, and Italians limited to being south of a hexrow that was a couple of hexes north of Voronezh (the northenmost point of the SW front). We actually just finishe

Okay have to ask German obb lets say you get your fw190 units and upgrade your ju87 then a month later the ju 87 is withdrawn from play but you have no ju 87 counters left. what happens or is it just no effect etc since the counter to be with drawn is gone? Same thing like with 10-6 armor what happe

Do they simply return to the Force pool so they can be built again? This scenario results in overflowding of Soviet Guard troops in the map, where they make a majority of forces.

Since I have posted here several times already, I've decided to talk about this card. I kinda don't understand in which scenario it can be useful. It only gives MP to Romania which are immediately taken back as soon as the Red Army retakes Chisinau. Romania is really under no threat of Morale collap

So have to ask 3 to 2 attack causes a stalemate result and then a combat die roll result for the cost of 1 moral for 2 turns. How the hell is this a small soviet card that comes back every 2 seasons. the soviet large cards are not this good. the old card was change the attack into attacker press s

ORGANIZE: (...) or B) Place this marker in your Force Pool where it can be spent (i.e., returned to its Draw Pool) during a future Free Stuff Step to place THREE Detachments (251.2). but t latter in the same place : ECRUIT: Place this marker in its Faction’s Force Pool and, on a later turn’s Free

Usually, when no Defending units remain in the Battle hex because they have all been eliminated (except due to a Stalemate result, Defender can Press (step loss) result, or the application of A Bridge (or Beach) Too Far (...) I think this rule ([328.2.1]) is only included in the full version of t

hello. In regard to "Fudging", it is mentioned that "outlaw" units will return to play for free. However, shouldn't it be stated that they must be immediately temporarily removed from the game ? (and provide details on where, when, how, etc...). I didn't see any rules regarding repatriation. Maybe

Hello everybody! I'm French, and I'm trying to translate the rules for my own use. It's not always easy, and I'm currently facing a particular case here... Maybe someone can lend me a hand ? [220.3.1] SUPPLIED(...) If playing a Campaign Game, Supplied Factories, Oil Cities, and Personnel Cities (re

Hello everybody. I'm playing a Vassal Tite game with a fellow wargamer. We are both beginners and tried our hands with the Barbarossa scenario. I was too cautious with the german and by August, the Red Army was able to mount counter attacks and we decided to throw the towel for this one. We plan to

The new rules say that the Isolation HQ is not eliminated, but rolls the dice whatever happens to it. Similar to the units in Isolation.I have doubts about this solution. An army in isolation, with some supplies, can fight for some time. But HQ represents the entire supply and command system, which

In my current solo game I have just played round 25 Week 1 of February 1942. The Germans finaly experienced Extreme Cold and the offensive stopped dead. The Soviets desperate to secure the line and fill the gaps decided to play the card manpower shortages and return 9 conscripts to the pool and gain

Does this card allow to move troops right to any railway hex between yours and enemy's cities? For example, can a Soviet army rail-move to 9036 near V. Luki, effectively bypassing all German defences? I mean it can, according to the card description but this seems a little bit broken.

I wanted to get a sanity check on a game in progress. We've been speculating on the future direction this game and wanted to hear perspectives from others playing the ETO rules on the current board position. The question is: Which side has the advantage? How would you project the short-term (19