©2019 by Watchword. Proudly created with Wix.com

Oct 10

IPs in ETO

8 comments

Since IPs have now been limited (especially for the USSR) with the revised rules and are more Event Card driven, I think the "abandoned" requirement should be relaxed. It allows for the use of the IPs in more critical locations well to the rear before the fighting gets there.

 

Any thoughts on that?

I'm not sure we need to change the "abandoned" Improved Defense marker rules. You have only to leave 1 unit to "keep alive" an entire chain of them. I mean, SOMEBODY has to keep them maintained or they will become ineffective.

Oct 10

I thought of that too, but then got to thinking that early when the USSR is in need of IPs, they have no units to spare well to the rear ... just to keep a single critical location fortified. When I say well to the rear ... I'm talking more than 12 hexes behind the rapidly decomposing Soviet Front Lines.

 

If the IPs are placed where the Soviet Units are at in early game , German Armored Units will just bypass them.

 

I think going the route where IPs are more Event Card driven is a GOOD one. However, I can see that these cards are not going to be effectively used, because the front is like Swiss cheese for Soviets. Maybe there should be a Return to Deck card (or Set Aside) that just allows the Soviets nothing but IPs? After all, they were known for digging in all the time.

 

 

" they have no units to spare well to the rear ... " And yet, at Barbarossa, 2/3 of their forces were off the front line "in the rear." I'm busy designing the larger "ETO universe" of cards right now for the Development Team to go over. Making sure the IP work everywhere, not just the Soviet Union's, is an important consideration.

Oct 11

I know that at start, there are rear area units there. It is that they quickly find their way to the front to face the deluge on turns 1, 2 and even 3. So it thins very fast. At least that has been my experience.

 

Certainly IPs need to work in the big ETO picture. Maybe keep my idea in your possible toolbox, that having an Event Card for USSR that is just an IP build (with nothing else) and make it Set Aside or even Return To Deck. It will allow Soviets, who were known traditionally as excellent at digging in, that ability at the cost of not having other Event Cards.

 

 

Will do. But before I look down and inspect each tree I need to build the forest... :D

There is already a Soviet Set-Aside Card--"Mother Russia Wants You"--that gives you six IDM and a Garrison. This may not seem like much, but we don't think the IDM's should be so easy to get. Alan and Jeff were too macho (or something :D) to build these, but finally saw my IDM's and we all agreed we wanted less of them. It was fun to build them, but attacking vs. less of them is exhilarating for me. There is no longer a limit of only two Garrisons being built per turn, so it shouldn't be too hard to tend to fewer IDM's. If in Cities they aren't abandoned when in EZOC's. I don't remember if they need an OLOC.

Oct 24

That's my point though. It is a "Set Aside" card, as opposed to a "Return to deck" card. Soviets were very adept at building fortifications and digging in ... a "Set Aside" card is available only once every season. While a "Return" card can be use monthly.

 

This would serve both worlds better ... way less IPs on the map, but allow for the Soviet to use a card monthly as the situation changes rapidly. Otherwise, they'll never waste a card until the line is static.

Oct 24Edited: Oct 24

@sielski Well, you make a good point. There should not be much abuse as a Return card. There could be quite a few after a lot of Mud in the Spring, but it would cost card choices. What was so troubling to me was the ability to dig so much, so fast out in the open in the Summer of '41--it seemed to shut down the Blitzkrieg, and obscure terrain differences, but that has been fixed. I lack experience with the later years, but look forward to less IDM's and more dynamic counterattacks in '43 on.

New Posts
  • I just ran my very first simulation using the revised "Devastating Airfields Attacks" and was only able to destroy 9 of the 22 VVS aircraft. Only kept one Stuka 'saved" for CAS, and made sure I included the +1 DV for Major Air Bomber exclusive attacks. So what am I missing that the majority of the Soviet VVS is available for July I? Why did design team go from basically crippling the VVS, to having a competent VVS in July I '41? (Second simulation was worse at 8 VVS destroyed.) Granted, the die rolls were crappy for two sets .... but this could happen, and we know how some of us like to complain about the Vassal die roller. 3rd = 14 4th = 16 5th = 12 6th = 10 I won't post more simulations, but would like to understand the thought process so I can adjust tactics and strategy accordingly, since there will be a VVS present right from the start.
  • I see the restrictions on Hungary and Romania for the Axis side, but I can't see any restrictions for USSR. Can they attack and exert ZOCs across border, etc.? Thanks.
  • Looking at the Axis Display Mat ... there is an arrow that specifically goes from the "Repair" line and turns specifically into the JU-52 Training Box. Why? Reading [353.0] it seems like the only way into that box is from the Air Mat as a transfer. Or are you saying that if the JU-52 is in the Destroyed box, I can just "repair" it for 1 FP? Also, there is an asterisk the words "1 for Major*" I can't find where the note that applies to that on the mat is. So what does that mean? Thanks! Doc